Secret/Teaser GM Ad Campaign for OnStar Hacked

Messages
4,917
Likes
18
Location
Reading,PA
#1
There's really two stories here:
1. A Secret/Teaser GM Advertising campaign has been hacked.
2. GM apparently will include OnStar as standard equipment on all vehicles.

Has anyone actually seen these billboards?

=======================================================
CNET.COM

Can an advertising campaign based on a teaser survive after its secret has been let out?

The marketing team at General Motors hopes so, after some Web surfers spoiled a national promotion that was intended to gradually reveal a secret message.

Under the campaign, which is about half completed, each day a billboard in a different part of the country divulges a word (or a punctuation mark) in a message. A billboard in Arlington, Texas, for example, says "you." One in New York City shows a period.

The billboards also promote a Web site on which GM explains that it created the campaign to spread "a message so important we need the whole country to tell it."

But some Web visitors quickly found that most of the "secret" message is included in the site's source code.

In a posting on the site's bulletin boards, a Web surfer using the name "J1mmy" wrote that the message was: "This is the last time you will ever have to feel alone on our nation's roadways."

The meaning, J1mmy speculated, was that all new GM vehicles would soon be equipped with OnStar, the factory-installed safety and communications system that is already available in many models.

"They did crack the code," said Rob Peterson, a communications manager at GM. "We expected it to be solved, we just didn't expect it to be solved in this manner."

Although J1mmy and other sleuths did not crack a second, shorter sentence that is part of the message, they clearly took glee in beating the system as much as they had.

"Lol, how sad," another visitor wrote. "They left all the words right out in the open, waiting for someone to either use an SWF Scanner or Hex Editor to find the words. Encrypt it for us next time, give us a challenge, lol."

The promotion continues through the end of the month.
 
Messages
453
Likes
0
Location
Hartselle, AL
#6
bmw046series said:
Well look at their vehicles, its pretty clear they are out of ideas.
tell me about it. they have re-bored the same block 3 times. what started out as a 2.8l v-6, went to a 3.1, then a 3.4, and now a 3.5. And Pontiac. what the hell, am I th only one that realizes that all of the cars on that line look almost completly the same. they need to straigten out the crap they have before introducing new crap.
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#7
poboyis said:
tell me about it. they have re-bored the same block 3 times. what started out as a 2.8l v-6, went to a 3.1, then a 3.4, and now a 3.5. And Pontiac. what the hell, am I th only one that realizes that all of the cars on that line look almost completly the same. they need to straigten out the crap they have before introducing new crap.
Good point but almost all car manufacturers still build engines the same way they did in the past. The same basic designs are almost exactly the same, just added a few nifty things like variable valve timing.
 
Messages
1,831
Likes
0
Location
Winston Salem, NC
#8
poboyis said:
tell me about it. they have re-bored the same block 3 times. what started out as a 2.8l v-6, went to a 3.1, then a 3.4, and now a 3.5. And Pontiac. what the hell, am I th only one that realizes that all of the cars on that line look almost completly the same. they need to straigten out the crap they have before introducing new crap.
I understand what you are saying, and I'm not defending Pontiac here, but in the mid to late 80s all of the BMWs looked the same. They were more or less just bigger or smaller versions of the same styled-car, and those were the "glory days" of BMW.

I definitely agree with the whole 3.5 engine thing. I cannot for the life of me figure out why GM is going nuts with the 3.5 and putting it in everything now. That engine (in the 2.8 and 3.4 forms) has always gotten horrible reviews - it is noisy, coarse, sounds like total crap, and just isn't sporty at all. I think it's ridiculous that they are designing these new world-class platforms that are really really good (the Epsilon platform that the Malibu, G6, and Saab 9-3 are built on is a wonderful chassis - very stiff, very safe) and then chucking a bored-out out crappy old 3.4-turned-3.5 engine in it. Makes no sense at all. I really wish GM would invest in some engine R&D outside of the Cadillac division and the Corvette.
 
Messages
4,917
Likes
18
Location
Reading,PA
#9
jrt67ss350 said:
.... I cannot for the life of me figure out why GM is going nuts with the 3.5 and putting it in everything now. That engine (in the 2.8 and 3.4 forms) has always gotten horrible reviews - it is noisy, coarse, sounds like total crap, and just isn't sporty at all. I think it's ridiculous that they are designing these new world-class platforms that are really really good (the Epsilon platform that the Malibu, G6, and Saab 9-3 are built on is a wonderful chassis - very stiff, very safe) and then chucking a bored-out out crappy old 3.4-turned-3.5 engine in it. Makes no sense at all. I really wish GM would invest in some engine R&D outside of the Cadillac division and the Corvette.
And if you don't believe Justin, I'll go out and start up my Firebird and post a WAV file - it sounds like Fred Astaire doing a tap dance routine!!!!!! I SO want to rip out that POS engine and drop in a small block....
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#10
Kirby said:
And if you don't believe Justin, I'll go out and start up my Firebird and post a WAV file - it sounds like Fred Astaire doing a tap dance routine!!!!!! I SO want to rip out that POS engine and drop in a small block....
Oooh which engine does it have? I think the 3.1 liter V6 is a horrible sounding engine. Our 3.4 in our van sounds like it wants to fall apart at around 3,000 rpm. Just...crappy.
 
Messages
4,917
Likes
18
Location
Reading,PA
#11
2.8 L V6, the 3.1 came out a few years later as "better" and "bigger" - same POS with a different bore and stroke. My S10 had the same 2.8 , I rebuilt it at 50K - 60K (I forget exactly) and replaced at 110K. It's just so sadly typical of GM thay they can build a quality, flexible engine like the SBC (small block chevy) and then turn around and produce this crap.
 
Messages
467
Likes
0
Location
_
#13
As many of you know, I like GM.... Actually, I like F-Bodies and Corvette.

For those of you that have a problem w/ GM's V6 it's simple:

You should've bought their V8 [joke]

[burnout]
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#14
gpoints said:
As many of you know, I like GM.... Actually, I like F-Bodies and Corvette.

For those of you that have a problem w/ GM's V6 it's simple:

You should've bought their V8 [joke]

[burnout]
Wasn't an option on our montana [:p]
 
Messages
6,984
Likes
0
Location
New Jersey
#15
Pontiac looks like they are trying to improve, though. The new GTO, G6, and Grand Prix are good-looking cars and the commercials are cool. Okay so maybe Pontiac ins't that great but the 05 GTO is so hot. 400hp and it looks great.
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#16
MrElussive said:
Pontiac looks like they are trying to improve, though. The new GTO, G6, and Grand Prix are good-looking cars and the commercials are cool. Okay so maybe Pontiac ins't that great but the 05 GTO is so hot. 400hp and it looks great.
THe new grand prix is one of the ugliest cars on the road. The GTO and G6 are okay thought.
 
Messages
2,611
Likes
5
Location
Seattle Area
#17
epj3 said:
THe new grand prix is one of the ugliest cars on the road. The GTO and G6 are okay thought.
I actually saw a new GTO w/after market rims in a shopping mall last week. I have to admit it looked really good. Better than some of these revived muscle cars of old...
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#18
///M SPEED said:
I actually saw a new GTO w/after market rims in a shopping mall last week. I have to admit it looked really good. Better than some of these revived muscle cars of old...
People say it doesnt have a retro look, and others say it's girly. I think it's a VERY clean design. I personally like it...
 
Messages
2,611
Likes
5
Location
Seattle Area
#19
epj3 said:
People say it doesnt have a retro look, and others say it's girly. I think it's a VERY clean design. I personally like it...
True about the retro look however, most all of the new models don't look like their predecessors. I don't think it looks girly at all. It looks very good. If I were in the market for a lower priced American car (that would be first for me) I would seriously look into this car. I like the looks a lot...
 


Top