Rolls Royce Phantom

Messages
342
Likes
0
Location
MA
#2
I don't really see a resemblence, the first one has a girl sitting on it, the second one doesn't....

Really though, I think the whole idea of the 300C was to make the car look and feel like cars much more expensive than its price.
 
Messages
491
Likes
0
Location
Nebraska
#9
I see it--what the hell is my wife doing in that skimpy sh!t. I gonna have to spank her. [hihi]
Im all seriousness, MB has desinged nice Chryslers. The 300 looks really sweet up close. But the only Chrysler I would "probably" buy is the Crossfire SRT-6.
 
Messages
342
Likes
0
Location
MA
#10
HornyHornet said:
I see it--what the hell is my wife doing in that skimpy sh!t. I gonna have to spank her. [hihi]
Im all seriousness, MB has desinged nice Chryslers. The 300 looks really sweet up close. But the only Chrysler I would "probably" buy is the Crossfire SRT-6.
It was such a poor choice not to offer an manual tranny on that. Anyone buying an SRT car mostlikely wants a stick, at least the option to have one. Thats like making M3's with only automatics. If anything they should only offer sticks and no automatics, not the other way around. Other than that it is indeed a very sweet car (though not what I'd get if I had $50,000, can you say white S4 avant [:)] )
 
Messages
491
Likes
0
Location
Nebraska
#12
KevRC4130 said:
It was such a poor choice not to offer an manual tranny on that. Anyone buying an SRT car mostlikely wants a stick, at least the option to have one. Thats like making M3's with only automatics. If anything they should only offer sticks and no automatics, not the other way around. Other than that it is indeed a very sweet car (though not what I'd get if I had $50,000, can you say white S4 avant [:)] )
Not sure how worthy Chrysler's (oxy moron) tranny is, but again, another MB trait: auto tranny. I agree, manual a must, and for 50K, more like M3 for me.
 


Top