Mercedes phasing out the "Kompressor" in favor of Turbo

Messages
4,917
Likes
18
Location
Reading,PA
#1
Mercedes-Benz is to phase out its supercharged petrol engines, badged Kompressor, in favour of turbocharging, according to Automotive News Europe. The new A-Class range, on sale this autumn, will include a 2.0-litre turbo unit, and this engine will then be fitted in other line-ups. The M-B and Maybach V12 petrol engine is turbocharged, too.

Engine development head Juergen Frey told ANE that "turbochargers are superior to superchargers in terms of noise and cost. When we introduced the supercharged engines it was the right decision. Turbocharging has greatly improved in the meantime, and we have virtually no turbo lag any more."

ANE reports that turbocharging is making a comeback, as when combined with a smaller engine, it can reduce overall fuel consumption and help the manufacturers meet increasingly stringent emissions legislation. Some 40 percent of petrol-engined cars sold in Europe are expected to be turbocharged by 2008.
 
Messages
3,476
Likes
0
Location
Lincoln, CA
#2
Since they can keep torque up with the turbos and have pretty much eliminated lag, I really have no preference as to turbo or superchargers. I care more about the final product.

I don't see why they can't use the Kompressor label tho. Seems to me that it can be used on both supercharged or turbo engines. Most Mercedes buyers wouldn't know the difference anyways.
 
Messages
6,984
Likes
0
Location
New Jersey
#3
That's interesting. The thing I don't like about turbochargers is that they lose their "effect" over time and eventually die out (in which case they need to be replaced). In terms of forced induction, I think the best way to go is a bi-turbo setup.
 
Messages
2,339
Likes
3
Location
Germany
#4
Can't we all just get along? Turbo Charged...Supercharged what the hell is the difference (stupid question I know.....but i DON'T know)
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#5
tool fan said:
Can't we all just get along? Turbo Charged...Supercharged what the hell is the difference (stupid question I know.....but i DON'T know)
A turbo charger uses exhaust gas to drive a turbine, which in turn drives another turbine (connected in the center so they can spin) which forces air into the intake.

A supercharger lets the exhaust alone -- but using a belt driven by the engine, it forces air into the intake. A supercharger's performance is not nearly what a turbo CAN be... but a supercharger gives immediate boost, where a turbo must spool up. Go to www.howstuffworks.com and check it out.
 

epj3

Senior Member
Messages
7,370
Likes
0
Location
Lancaster, PA
#6
MrElussive said:
That's interesting. The thing I don't like about turbochargers is that they lose their "effect" over time and eventually die out (in which case they need to be replaced). In terms of forced induction, I think the best way to go is a bi-turbo setup.
My freinds 12 year old bi-turbo (or, since it's japanese...TWIN turbo...) stealth's performance disagree's with what you said. Yes, the one turbo is worn out and does not give max performance, but he still pushes about 14 psi.
 


Top